

CL Recap: The gift that keeps on giving
By: Jack | April 2nd, 2008At the start, Fenerbahce were run ragged, as if they were a pub team. In the end, it was Chelsea who resembled part-timers. Funny little world init?
Gifting the Turkish club two second-half goals following a dominant first-half performance, the Blues fell 2-1 in Instanbul in the opening leg of the two clubs’ Champions League quarterfinal tie. The tie should’ve been wrapped up, sealed and sent before 30 minutes had passed. But a lack of finishing coupled with an egregious display after the break dealt Chelsea a defeat — one that could prove costly though the Blues will still be favored to advance next week.
“I don’t know what to say,” said Avram Grant.
You also don’t know what you’re doing. If this man doesn’t unleash a 4-4-2 soon, I’m going to lose my mind.
Anyways. It was an odd European night to be sure. Chelsea opened superbly. Yeah, Fener was appalling, but I really thought we were absolutely commanding in the opening half. Thirteen minutes in the own-goal from Deivid arrived and from thereon, we produced chance after chance — none of which were converted.  I must admit I was worried, and I think that says a lot about this team in its current form.
 Of course, my worries were warranted. We slumped after the break and, by the final whistle, looked horribly poor. Again, management played a role (surprise surprise). Fener’s Zico provided the goods when he threw on Kazim Kazim aka the artist formely known as Colin Kazim-Richards, who eventually netted the equalizer — which coincidentally sparked the side into the match. Grant, as usual, was complacent to negative effect, withdrawing Lampard for Mikel (super positive) in the 76th minute and waiting until the 86th to bring on Anelka. To tell you the truth, his decision making is mind-boggling.
You would think Grant would have recognized the chance for us to settle this tie in the first leg. At 1-1, this was still a possibility. Instead, he chose to ride out his luck. He could have A. brought on Anelka with 30 minutes to go, percievably to make a final push, or B. he could have closed up shop — like Mourinho would have. He chose neither and what did we get? A bemusing display from the team over the final 30. Sure, Deivid’s winner was an uncanny strike, and yeah, we tried to sit on the 1-0 lead (not a bad idea really). But that doesn’t hide the fact that we were out-thought in the second half. Changes needed to be made, and they weren’t; it’s that simple.
Just a quick comment on Drogba. I must say I thought he was dire, especially in the second half. Those two goals against Arsenal have done well to hide how mediocre — if not poor — he’s been since returning from the African Nations Cup. Most glaring Wednesday was his selfishness, specifically in positions where he had great opportunities to feed teammates. Also, I can’t leave without mentioning his ridiculous theatrics.  We need him to refocus, now. Â
Still, this tie is in our favor — no doubt about that. And I think we’ll advance. The real problem, and the one our decent run of results has been hiding, is the deep-rooted sense of disunity that seems to have emerged at the club. It’s more prominent than we know if you ask me. Oh yeah, and there’s also that little problem of lacking real managerial acumen at the most crucial position. We may need that over the next few weeks. I guess we shall see.
| EPL Match Schedule | Discount Travel to London & Chelsea | |||
| Chelsea Scores | Stamford Bridge information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



On a positive note, the Bridge should be re named Stamford Fortress. The home leg will be a different story.
Posted from
United States

-



I couldn’t agree more with your comments. Drogba certainly needs to re-focus and should have been taken off after an hour. It was obvious from the first 10 minutes that he was going to have a poor game. Once he starts the histrionics he’s never the same player. Can anyone tell me what Florent malouda has done to warrant a start in a CL quarter final? And Michael Essien at right back, where he looked totally out of sorts, was a mistake particularly when Paolo is keeping the bench warm. Mikel for Lamps? 4 minutes for Anelka? There’s only one real change we need to make. I actually fear for the home leg. 0-0?
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



Another big stage game where this ass clown Grant gets tactically outmatched and the team comes undone. I know we have an away goal and the place is tough to play, etc, etc. I don’t care. This team is a Ferrari with low octane gas and a 80 year old woman in the driver’s seat as long as Grant’s running the show.
Posted from
United States

-



Just heartbreaking, I still can’t believe how we didn’t put away the match before the first half whistle. I’m confident that we will perform at Stamford Bridge, but there is no margin for error! I can’t believe how wrong Grant gets the substitutions.
Posted from
United States

-



Hate to say it but this is a perfect example of why Man U will probably win this whole thing; they put away the few chances they even had. I mean this was basically the Middlesboro game all over again only they capitalized where ‘boro did not. You allow a team to hang around long enough it will eventually bite you in the end.
Posted from
United States

-



I assumed when he took off Lampard and put on Mikel that he was trying to shut up shop and play for a draw – which is extremely negative and an overestimation of how good Mikel is.
Posted from
United States

-



oh, turkish delight ..
Posted from
Canada

Comments are closed












