

Isn’t it obvious? The case for Frank Lampard
By: Jack | May 14th, 2009I never got around to discussing Frank Lampard’s omission from the list of nominees for the PFA Player of the Year — an award Ryan Giggs oddly won. This week we learned that Stevie Gerrard had been named the FWA Footballer of the Year. … Rubbish.
Our boys over at the EPL Offside — Rob and Wayne — have asked who we (the royal we) think is the best player in the Premier League. Now seems as good a time as any to make the obvious case, the case for Super Frank.
Gerrard beat out United boys Giggs and Rooney for his hardware. The PFA list was even more hilarious. It featured six players, five of which resided in the red half of Manchester. Ludicrous? Of course. But that’s not the point.
The most baffling aspect of it all was Lampard’s name not even being among the six nominated. You know, now is the perfect time to discuss this travesty. As Didier Drogba would say: “It’s a f****** disgrace.”

Why Lampard has yet to win a PFA award is just as bemusing as his omission this time around. This year’s honor, which covers part of 2007-08 as well, should have been all Frank. It’s quite an easy argument, really.
This season, at the time of the announcement of nominations (mid-April), Super Frank had already punched home 19 goals from 46 appearances while adding 17 assists. That’s more than a goal every three matches, an astonishing tally for a midfielder. I have also read that Lampard, as of late April, had created 131 scoring chances for teammates — a number more than double that of Gerrard, who sat at 70. This was said to be a new Premier League record.
As of right now, Lampard has 20 goals and 20 assists in 67 starts in all competitions. Those are phenomenal numbers, my friends.
And remember, much of this was done with Chelsea imploding from nearly every angle. At one point, Scolari was sinking the ship; Drogba was nowhere to be found. And we were on the verge of plummeting down the Premier League standings. Maybe those drab performances through the middle of the season — seeing as votes have to be submitted by the end of February — skewed the eyes of voters. It should have been the opposite; this man continued to flourish while so many around him were floundering.
His performance in Chelsea’s 4-4 draw with Liverpool in the second leg of the Champions League quarterfinal was exquisite. Netting twice, the last of which capped the night, Lampard was superlative. He was, simply put, the star of the game of the season. If that’s not worth a nomination, I don’t know what is.
Over the past five years, I’d wager no player in the Premier League — native or foreign — has been as consistently good as Frank Lampard. This will be his fourth consecutive season with 20 goals. Let me break that down for you: 20 in 2005-06, 21 in 2006-07 and 20 in 2007-08. He netted 19 in 2004-05. Simply put, this kind of achievement is amazing. A midfielder with a 20 goals per season average? Crazy.
There it is. I rest my case. When it comes to Premier League performers, there are few — if any — better than one Frank Lampard.
| EPL Match Schedule | Discount Travel to London & Chelsea | |||
| Chelsea Scores | Stamford Bridge information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



100% agreed.
Posted from
United States

-



Frank Lampard is incredibly underappreciated – Phenomenal player whom I try to base my own game around
Go Chelsea!
Posted from
United States

-



Since when is 131 more than double 70? lol.
A agree that Giggs probably shouldnt have won the award for PFA player of the year. Nor should VDS + Rio have been nominated. Rooney, Lampard, Ireland were all more than worthy nominations for that list.The stats for lampard is impressive, but he hasnt single handedly kept his team in the title race – unlike gerrard.
Posted from
United States

-



Also, gerrard won the award for writer’s player of the year, so it helps if you’re in the news a lot. (being involved in unbalanced fights helps a lot)
Posted from
United States

-



I’m not surprised that Gerrard won this award. He deserves it. But so does Lampard. Gerrard was just involved in more drama.
Concerning the PFA Player of the Year… Both nominations and winner didn’t make much sense.Posted from
Poland

-



I actually wholeheartedly agree. I’ll be running the other candidates on the main page over the next week though.
Posted from
United States

-



Ah, thought I had nearly double. I apologize.
Posted from
United States

-



oh come on, 131 might as well be double 70 in the world of soccer. the point is that frank lampard is far and away the more efficient player across all categories. he creates more goal scoring opportunities for himself and team mates, scores more goals on the average, and assists more goals than most if not all midfielders in the premier league.
it’s a shame that such a player isn’t even considered for the PFA award, especially during seasons where he was nominated for the FIFA world player of the year award, losing only to a simply magical ronaldinho in his prime.
Posted from
United States

-



FAT Frank with the ‘phatest’ six pack in professional football, not to be nominated for either award was a disgrace!
Posted from
United Kingdom

Comments are closed












