PL Recap: Manchester United 3-1 Chelsea

By: Jack | September 18th, 2011
   

No disrespect to other clubs, but Sunday’s Premier League clash of titans at Old Trafford was a meeting between the two finest clubs in England over the past decade. And, for once, it didn’t just live up to the media hype – it transcended it.

505881903
Did that really just happen?

Sunday’s match truly had everything. Beauty and horror, passion and agony, class and just plain old anarchy – it all was on display for an impassioned audience that must have thought it was dreaming. Equal parts thrilling and bizarre, I felt as if I was ghosting about my apartment as the second half unfolded. Is this real?

It was. This spectacle will ultimately be remembered more for its numerous moments of sheer chaos – the spotlight on Fernando Torres no doubt – than the result, a seemingly comfortable win for the reigning champions, off to their best start in 26 years. They’re form remains firm, many will say. I would agree. But it wasn’t a walk in the park for Sir Alex Ferguson’s men. Quite the opposite in fact.

United were at times good, at times irresistible going forward. They also were at times frenzied in defense, fortunate and at times totally under the cosh. Chelsea, meanwhile, displayed a fighting spirit not seen since Guus Hiddink’s memorable run as manager at the end of the 2008-09 season. There was great fluidity and incisive movement to go with a gaggle of gilt-edged chances – more than I can ever remember us creating at Old Trafford. All this to go with at times very poor decision-making at the back, a tablespoon of miscommunication and some of the worst finishing this side of my bedroom. Just awful.

As results go, in the end this one was deserved. I think. But by no means are we to feel mass disappointment or bury our collective head. No sir. There is much to build from. Much to be proud of. While we cannot walk away with a point (or points), what we can take from this defeat is substantial: that we can stand, and conceivably hurdle, the defending Premier League Champions. That in itself is a massive achievement so early in what must be considered a transitional period.

The Rundown
• Villas-Boas is the man to take this team forward, no question.
• The result represents AVB’s first defeat since April 2010, when his Academica side lost 3-2 at home to Benfica. That’s a long ass time.
• Our play was inspired at times, only to be let down by poor defending and genuine weirdness.
• Torres reinvented himself as a YouTube sensation, for all the wrong reasons. He was, in spite of that moment, the best Chelsea player on the field Sunday.
• Frank Lampard’s day has come. As I said on Twitter, the game – and not just this one in particular – is passing him by. He is no longer a regular starter, and perhaps not even a regular off the bench. A role similar to Ryan Giggs will suit him well this season. Thereafter, evaluation is very much needed.
• I’m simultaneously angry and pleased. That’s odd, and fitting considering the events of today.

505882467

What else to talk about?

There’s no reason to dwell on the missed chances, particularly that of Torres. The media is currently doing that for us. What I will say about the Spaniard, as said in the rundown, is that he was, aside from that horror show, as close to his best as we’ve seen him since the move. He may well be humiliated by what happened – looking at him as he exited the field, it did not appear so – but his overall play resembled that of a world-class performer. There was greatness in him today. Liverpool fans and the like can attempt to deny it, but it was out there for all to see. The goal was described as Romario-esque by Henry Winter in the Telegraph. Even in the spectacular miss, he showed uncanny movement and a truly absurd little hesitation move to round David De Gea. If Torres can manage to keep his head, he may well be primed to blossom once again.

And that brings us to making sure we get the best out of the player. Villas-Boas’ tactical nous was once again on display, as was his ability to not take any shit. He yanked an anonymous Lampard at halftime. He switched to a fluid 4-2-3-1 for the second half. Both fantastic decisions. It was the 4-2-3-1 that seemed to get the best out of most involved, mainly the Spaniards (Torres and Juan Mata). Mata was positioned in the hole just behind the striker and was a constant threat. Torres, meanwhile, received the kind of service he thrives on. The 4-3-3 was not exactly ineffective – there were chances throughout the opening 45 minutes – but there was a noticeable difference after the change. We already knew AVB was tactically flexible, but it’s still nice to know he’s not afraid to make pivotal changes on a regular basis. It’ll be interesting to see what he does against both Fulham on Wednesday in the League Cup and Swansea on the weekend.

I don’t really know what else to say. I’m sure I’ve left out a tone, but that match took a hell of a lot out of me, both emotionally and physically. More than I expected. I was relatively fine during the opening half; disappointed we had somehow conceded three goals, yes, but of the understanding that that was anomaly. We’ll play much worse than that and not concede this season. The final 45 minutes, however, sucked the life out of me and you and everyone else watching – Jessica from True Blood style. Jessica Hamby, yes.

It was indeed a spectacle. And, you know, from what we’ve seen of Villas-Boas-managed Chelsea, I think we can expect more of these type of matches this season. Not sure I can survive anymore of that to be honest. Whatever happens, it is bound to be exciting. I remain as optimistic as I was when the man was appointed. We’re in for something special. Man, when was the last time you felt this positive (this is me assuming you feel as I do) after a loss? This is wild.

KTBFFH


Some Related Chelsea Posts:


Tags

   
  • Chenlsea

    Some tactical reflection: How will Chelsea do better in defending Man U-style of wing-led counter or fast break? To win EPL and CL this year, to counter teams that plays with genuine wingers, we need to solve this tactical problem. Three of goals that we lost are all lost in Man U's counters: Bossman's untimely tackle on Ashley Young on the left, Nani's free run from right side, Phil Jones' run on the right. 


    The question is would Mikel's start yesterday have done better? 


    Pressure and interception on opponent's a-3rd helped indeed. The best defense against Man U-style of fast break is to pressure the opponent's deep-lying playmaker(s). In Man UTD's case, that will be Anderson.  Torres' first chance came from Anderson's mistake under pressure by Ramires.  


    If we are to play 4-2-3-1 style, our middle-field front three are not genuine interceptors like Yaya Toure or Fletcher/Cleverly. This is why Man City and Man UTD can consistently applies pressure on opponents this season so far by in Basketball term, getting a high percentage of "rebounds". 
     

    When Lampard is playing and when he was good or "Bison" playing , we have this role-they are  genuine 'rebounders' to apply consistent pressure on opponents. That's essentially the "old Chelsea" which worn out opponents in doing so. 


    Who would help us to get all those "rebounds" in the new Chelsea? Just a thought. Do we have to count on Ramires or Meileres, or "Bison" on his return, or the reinvented Lampard who doesn't get into the box like before but play like Yaya Toure to intercept on opponent's 30-yard line preventing fast-break and make another deadly pass to Torres? 


    This interceptor role could be the missing piece in the new 4-2-3-1 formation by AVB. 

  • United's opening two goals were easily avoidable with simple defending. Bosignwa gave away a poor free kick for the first; no need for that at all. The second stemmed from Mata going feminine in his challenge with Nani. He must do better. Sure, Meireles was late getting over to Nani, but I put it on Mata. 

    A rotation of Mikel, Meireles and Ramires in the double pivot works for me. They'll get it right.

  • Mateo

    i think Mikel would of helped to close spaces, the space we gave nani in the second goal was just stupid. 

  • Maysam

    I think on Nani goal, Mata let Nani pass him so easily and his strike was a special one (happens once in a decade). I choose Meireles any day over Mikel. Mikel is great at defending and simple passes but he does not have ability to move the ball forward.
    I think our line up was great against Manchester. I wish Bosingwa was a better defender .. he has improved a lot but still missing something.

  • Gianfranco

    Chelsea team to play Fulham in League Cup: 
     
                           Turnbull 
    Ferriera - David Luiz - Terry - Bertrend 
            John Obi Mikel - McEachran 
              Sturridge - Mata - Anelka 
                            Torres 
    Mixture of youth, experience, and some fringe players and a chance to try out the new attack which played well against MUFC in the 2nd half. Can't take Fulham lightly as they will put out their best 11. AVB can't take the League Cup lightly, it may be a Mickey Mouse cup but winning it mid-season will give the Chelsea players a winning mentality under AVB. 

    Chelsea team to Swansea City in the League: 

                             Cech 
    Bosingwa - Ivanovic - Terry - A. Cole 
                    Ramires - Meireles 
              Sturridge - Mata - Anelka 
                            Torres 

    4-2-3-1 is the way forward and if we get Nando scoring again Chelsea could become a real brute force once again. These are the 'fast' players Torres needs to support him and it showed at Old Trafford. If he can forget that HOWLER of a miss and think of the rest of his performance in the game, which was very good, then I really think we can see the return of Fernando Torres. 

  • That League Cup team has too many first-team representatives for me. Josh, Romeu, Bertrand, Chalobah should all get a look. Malouda and Anelka, along with Bob and Paulo, among those to give us experience.

  • Gianfranco

    Romeu for Obi and Chalobah for Terry, maybe. The rest I'd keep the same. Our midfield can't be too inexperienced and weak against Fulham, they shouldn't be taken lightly. I'd definitely keep the attack the same to see how it goes and if it clicks as it arguably did at Old Trafford. 

  • Magic-freddy

    Oh gosh... here we go again.
    Fergilicous is not happy with the referees, not because his team received two dubious goals from offside positions, but because Ashley tackled one of his players, and only received a yellow card, and no penalty was awarded, even though the ball was clearly out of play.
    And of course, that will make the headlines...
    If I remember well, Evans went kung fu crazy on drogba last year, and guess who received the card? Lol. Drogba, of course. and I can't remember fergilicious complaining that day...
    The newspapers in england, I swear, have a clear agenda against Chelsea, and not to mention useless refs like Phil Dowd.
    United, for all their good football, are always helped by all the "luckiest" calls you could ever get in football. Lucky for us, there is a team who get those even more than them... Barcelona. When those two meet, it is the only time, Manu gets a taste of their own medecine...lol.

  • azal_matti

    still the team plays so slow, there is no quick transition from defense to attack, and when ManU was counter-attacking there was acres of space left behind for them to dwell on.
    the defense was shaky. the third goal was a joke. 2 ManU's strikers were alone in the sex yard box with no one close to them and beside there was a lot of poor defending. what was the name of the player who was pairing with john terry? and why david luiz or alex were not playing !!

  • chelsea4eva

    we got 21 shots away 4m home against manu..that itself shows how good we were....torres was brilliant except the miss..but if he can shrug off that miss n continue like he played yest then i can see him score many...n many people have forgotten that sturridge was awful yest..he was playing like it's a reserve game,shotting from anywhere n playing selfish..that's the only thing i hate about his game..

  • Maysam

    Without doubt best performance I have seen from Chelsea at Old Trafotd ...

  • ph0bolus

    Since i'm a bit of a masochist i watched MOTD.  When I saw the replay of Torres taking that ball down, getting past two players, had his shot blocked then the rebound just over...It seriously gave me goosebumps..Hopefully its an indication of what's to come from the 50mil investment.  The commentary from Jonathan Pierce on that Torres miss was pretty entertaining as well..

  • Mateo

    LoL. that picture of Danny and Ramires is so fucked up

  • Mateo

    i think the tragedy relies on the fact that the final score in no way reflects those 95minutes of  play. it was a game in which we went down with our boots on. Torres will be remembered for his flop, when he  could've  pulled of a hat trick. it just wasnt in his stars today. The team played with honor but fate sent them home empty handed.

  • Chenlsea

    Quietly, do you know, Chelsea has started a Revolution. AVB in just 6 short games, gave this Chelsea team a Character, with pace, flair, resilience and dramatics. I haven't seen a EPL game like this one that kept you constantly at the edge of your seat. AVB has led this Chelsea team to transcend a rivalry and in turn transcended EPL. There is ONLY one winner today, that is YOU who love soccer. 




    Chelsea should take confidence from this game that they can crush any kind of defense in this league in any field. 

    Hands down to the RETURN of El Nino!!!!!!!!

blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow Us

           




England National Team News

Search The Offside


 




Related Links


Categories


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email chelsea[at]theoffside[dot]com

Write for The Offside

Archives