The Transfer Ban: It just keeps getting better

By: Jack | September 12th, 2009

Here’s the latest on the now infamous transfer ban FIFA sanctioned on Chelsea a week or so ago. You know, the one that involves a bemusing infraction – perhaps non-existent but totally incomprehensible regardless –  regarding a 16-year-old player who had, or had not, signed a pre-contract with a club in a country where a pre-contract may or may not be tangible.


A sight not to be seen for sime time, apparently.

In addition to being banned from signing new players for two transfer periods, Chelsea have now been told by FIFA that it cannot recall any players who are currently on season-long loans. That means Scott Sinclair, on loan at Wigan, will not be returning anytime soon. Michael Mancienne, currently at Wolverhampton, may not be eligible to return either.

“If it’s a season-long loan, it cannot be terminated in order to bring players back,” said a FIFA spokesman.

Come again? So, what you’re telling me is that Chelsea can’t field players it owns? Brilliant that is.

What’s next?



Chelsea EPL Match ScheduleBet on Chelsea games Travel to soccer games Discount Travel to London & Chelsea
Chelsea ScoresBuy Chelsea TicketsStamford Bridge information & hotels



Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:The Transfer Ban: It just keeps getting better digg:The Transfer Ban: It just keeps getting better reddit:The Transfer Ban: It just keeps getting better fark:The Transfer Ban: It just keeps getting better Y!:The Transfer Ban: It just keeps getting better stumbleupon:The Transfer Ban: It just keeps getting better

Comments   |  Add your comment

  • BlrGnr |  September 13th, 2009 at 4:02 am

    cornercorner

    I heard Michael Mancienne has an emergency clause in his loan contract, so he can be recalled at anytime by Chelsea.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • cap123 |  September 13th, 2009 at 4:39 am

    cornercorner

    is there a difference between a recall clause and a termination clause? it has the same result doesn’t it so i’d think that would be disallowed too.. despite it being ridiculous.

    Posted from United Kingdom United Kingdom

    cornercorner
  • Bridging |  January 15th, 2010 at 11:11 am

    cornercorner

    nice article. thanks for sharing this.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner

Leave a Reply

If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse our
Commenting Guidelines.


England National Team News

Tickets to upcoming games


Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners









Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email chelsea[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives