Comments on: Transfer Central: The Lowdown

By: Goods

Goods — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:42:35 +0000

A minimum of two years? There’s no way any club in any league will give a manager two years. And don’t point to Fergie and Arsene; they won at their respective clubs before rough patches. Scolari has not.

By: ASR

ASR — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:04:10 +0000

what are you talking about… scolari wants to spend money, but he’s been told he won’t get any. Chelsea is not the go out and buy stars club anymore… at least not right now… Scolari has no say in financial matters… You can’t keep firing ur coaches every year… have to give scolari a minimum of two years to allow him to adapt and establish some stability…

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:21:29 +0000

They should sack Luiz Felipe Scolari and get some one else!!!! We have money to spend on players and he does not want to spend and we need to!!! I’m fed up a him!! instead of city buying kaka we should get in there.We have the money to buy him and we are better then “CITY”..

By: Mitch

Mitch — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:22:10 +0000

Yes podolski could work. After Bayern have told FC Koln they only want 10 mil Euro for him. I think We should defiantly get rid of malouda. He has been good for us in bits and pisces, but really has failed to make an impression under Avram Grant and also Scolari. Ribery Would be a great replacement. Doing a switch and paying a fee? But Chances are very slim after Bayern have priced Ribery at 60 ml Euro. Sell Alex if he wants to go, but keep ivanovic. Anelka has been quality for us, and drogba is a bit out of it. But we need to regular goal scores, but I don’t See Chelsea bidding for a striker until the summer. The only real possible for the winter is Zhirkov, Because Roman likes him and he’s Russian. Would be an Excellent signing.

By: ish

ish — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:03:03 +0000

keep ivanovic for sure. A striker i dont think we need, drogba+anelka is enough with di santo and stoch waiting for a real go. chelsea doesnt score goals from the striker, it scores from the midfield. Even if anelka is scoring its because he is able to utilise the midfield more then due to his own skill.
I want zhirkov because he is an amazing player, not truly a left back but thats of no consequence because he can play their and so can ferriera if needed. No one is going to displace a.cole from that position so no real need to buy a true left back. What zhirkov brings is real menace to the wings. In the russia game zhirkov was given accolodes for his briliiant play down the opposition wings where he is amazing. Would be an inspired signing.

By: Craig 4rm S.A

Craig 4rm S.A — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:36:40 +0000

podolski would be a SLIGHT possibility! He is a left footed striker,can play the wing or centre and is 23.(young considering our players).Ballack and him can get a torres/gerrard thing going on since theyre compartriots.watch euro 2008 trust me he can handle the physicality(he does the pushing)of the epl. He gets no game time at munich and out of favour with the coach.they want malouda as a long term replacement for ze roberto.so lets make a straight swop.no money involved. They value malouda more than we do.they want him unlike us with ciciniho. so it will be a ‘bargin’ for them. .in truth us. Think about it